Grieving Father Questions AI171 Crash Investigation Transparency

Published on September 18, 2025
Grieving Father Questions AI171 Crash Investigation Transparency,AI171, plane crash, investigation, transparency, pilot, father, India, accident, air safety,investigation,concerns,public,transparency,crash

The father of the pilot involved in the devastating AI171 air crash has voiced serious concerns regarding the ongoing investigation. He alleges a lack of transparency and demands a thorough, independent review of the process. The crash, which claimed numerous lives, has sent shockwaves across the nation and sparked intense public scrutiny.

Concerns Over Investigation Methodology

Mr. Rohan Sharma, father of Captain Vikram Sharma, the pilot of the ill-fated AI171 flight, expressed profound dissatisfaction with the current state of the investigation. He stated in a press conference yesterday that key details remain undisclosed, hindering his understanding of the events leading up to the tragic accident. He specifically questioned the timeline of events presented by the investigation team, suggesting inconsistencies that need further clarification. He emphasizes the need for complete transparency to bring closure to the families of the victims and prevent similar incidents in the future.

Demand for Independent Review

Mr. Sharma's concerns extend beyond the specifics of the investigation's findings. He is calling for an independent and impartial review of the entire process, conducted by experts unaffiliated with the initial investigation team. He believes this is crucial to ensure the integrity and credibility of the findings. He highlighted the potential for biases or oversight within a single investigative body and stressed the importance of an unbiased evaluation to determine the true cause of the crash.

Questions about Flight Data and Black Box Analysis

A central focus of Mr. Sharma’s concerns is the analysis of the flight data recorder (FDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR), commonly referred to as the “black boxes.” He questioned the speed and thoroughness of the analysis, hinting at potential delays that could compromise the accuracy of the investigation. He expressed his hope that all relevant data from both recorders is meticulously examined and not overlooked during the investigation process. He further called for the release of a preliminary report to the public to assuage public concerns and demonstrate the transparency of the investigation.

Impact on Public Trust

Beyond the immediate impact on Mr. Sharma and the families of the victims, the lack of transparency in the AI171 crash investigation raises broader concerns about public trust in investigative processes. The level of scrutiny from the public demands a clear and comprehensive explanation of the events surrounding the crash. Failure to deliver this transparency could erode public confidence in air safety regulations and investigative bodies. A thorough and independent review could help rebuild that trust and ensure that lessons learned from this tragedy are implemented effectively.

The call for greater transparency and an independent review highlights the importance of robust investigative practices and the need for clear communication with the public during such tragedies. The nation awaits the outcome of the investigation and the steps taken to address the concerns raised by Mr. Sharma and others impacted by this devastating event.